Here's a quick challenge question for you: what is the difference between Crank and JJ and reporters on The National Enquirer staff? Answer: reporters for The National Enquirer at least make up their own creative lies out of nothing. They don't take a real story and lie about it.
After hearing the story as joked about by Crank and JJ, later in the day, another one of our critics heard the story reported on another radio station, 107.1, The Duck. Their story contradicted the story as told by Crank and JJ. Sure enough, a local paper in Britain also contradicted Crank and JJ's version of the story. Some key points:
- The sum total paid over two years was $15,000, not $10,000.
- The couple did not shell out this money. Their pet insurance did.
- The surgery was not for cosmetic reasons. The dog suffered from a rare genetic defect that caused excessive bagginess of the skin. The face lift was to prevent the dog from going blind. The tummy tuck was to remove excessive skin that had become infected after having a large growth removed from the stomach.
Insurance wouldn't have paid for the surgery if the surgery were for cosmetic reasons only. Obviously, the dog suffered medically and needed attention. The couple should've been heralded as responsible pet owners for having the foresight to obtain pet insurance. Even if they had paid for the operations out of their own pocket, they should be heralded as responsible pet owners for getting their dog the necessary medical treatment to prevent the dog from suffering.
Now that Crank and JJ made dumbasses out of the couple by outright lying about the reasons for giving their dog a face lift and tummy tuck, we seriously question the validity of any of their daily dumbass reports. They've lost their credibility as news gatherers, but gained credibility as lazy entertainer wannabes. If you're going to make up the daily dumbass, at least be creative enough to come up with one out of your own imagination. Don't take a real story and omit the facts just so you have someone to make fun of.
No comments:
Post a Comment